The Senate Judiciary Committee hearing last week titled "A Threat to Justice Everywhere: Stemming the Tide of Hate Crimes in America" presented a critical opportunity to address the unprecedented rise in hate crimes affecting various communities across the country. As eager advocates and staffers lined up outside conference room G50 in the Dirksen Senate Building, few anticipated the ensuing cacophony of audience outbursts, sarcastic interruptions, and hateful questioning directed at an Arab and Muslim woman. This took place during a hearing focused on combating hate and discrimination in the wake of the October 7th terrorist attacks, which had led to a rise in Islamophobia, antisemitism, and attacks on immigrant and LGBTQ+ communities, among others.
The hearing opened with Committee Chair Dick Durbin setting the tone by acknowledging white supremacy as a pervasive threat in America. Ranking Member Lindsey Graham focused his remarks specifically on mitigating hate crimes targeting Jewish students on college campuses. As Senator Durbin redirected the conversation, he emphasized that the hearing aimed to address hate crimes affecting all communities.
The witnesses introduced included Maya Berry, Executive Director of the Arab American Institute; Kenneth S. Stern, Co-Chair of the Hate Crimes Task Force at The Leadership Conference for Civil and Human Rights; and Mark Goldfeder, Director of the National Jewish Advocacy Center. Each was allotted five minutes for their opening testimony, revealing distinct priorities. Berry spoke about the threat of hate to all targeted communities and stressed the importance of comprehensive legislation. In contrast, Goldfeder echoed Senator Graham's focus on protecting Jewish college students and codifying the International Holocaust Remembrance Alliance (IHRA) definition of antisemitism. While also addressing these issues, Stern found himself caught between the two perspectives, a dynamic shaped more by the tone and style of questioning from specific senators than by any inherent bias.
Memorable moments from the hearing ranged from frustrated audience outbursts to the constant interruptions faced by Berry. However, the most haunting moment came towards the end when Senator John Kennedy of Louisiana confronted Berry with Islamophobic questions about her alleged support for terrorist groups. Although this was not the first instance of targeting based on her identity, it was undoubtedly the most shameful. His concluding remark, suggesting she should "hide your head in a bag," elicited gasps from the audience, and many left in disgust, calling out the perpetuation of hateful rhetoric in a hearing meant to mitigate hate. The absurdity of such an attack in this context was striking.
Attending my first congressional hearing was more than expected; it was a whirlwind of excitement, curiosity, and hope. Yet I walked away feeling fear, frustration, and deep sadness. Countering hate should not be a partisan issue. As Ranking Member Durbin eloquently articulated, acknowledging the pain of both Palestinian and Jewish communities should not divide us. Moving forward from this contentious hearing, our elected officials must remember their primary responsibility: representing and serving ALL constituents. If this hearing is any indication, the path ahead will be challenging, but it is a challenge we must confront for the sake of democracy.
Tranée McDonald is the Policy & Advocacy Associate at Interfaith Alliance.
%20(1).png)
Interfaith Alliance Opposes the Antisemitism Awareness Act (AAA)
On April 29th, Interfaith Alliance joined our colleagues at over 30 other organizations across civil society in opposing the Antisemitism Awareness Act (AAA). By giving the federal government the power to withhold funding from organizations who run afoul of a particular definition of antisemitism, the AAA would needlessly stifle political free speech and empower the administration’s repressive agenda.
Rally for Patients’ Rights: A Day at the Supreme Court
On April 2nd, I joined Policy Intern Jeffrey Jordan and Policy and Advocacy Associate Tranée McDonald at the “Rally for Patient’s Rights” outside of the Supreme Court. That week, SCOTUS was hearing arguments on whether Medicaid patients would retain their right to choose their healthcare provider, stemming from South Carolina’s attempt to defund Planned Parenthood. The case, which began in 2018 when South Carolina’s governor barred Planned Parenthood of South Atlantic from providing Medicaid-funded services, threatens not only Planned Parenthood’s operations but could also reshape how states control access to healthcare.
New Interfaith Alliance Memo Details Trump Admin’s Attacks on Faith Communities
Trump announced at the National Prayer Prayer Breakfast an EO on countering ‘anti Christian bias,’ yet Interfaith Alliance is calling out the Trump administration for “incendiary and unprecedented attacks on faith communities”.