Trump and SCOTUS are Dismantling Church-State Separation. Learn how to fight back on 8/11 at 1:00 - 2:15 pm ET
RegisterThe views and beliefs expressed in this post and all Interfaith Alliance blogs are those held by the author of each respective piece. To learn more about the organizational views, policies and positions of Interfaith Alliance on any issues, please contact info@interfaithalliance.org.
Recently, the Sure Foundation Baptist Church (SFBC) in Indianapolis held a sermon in which the preacher called for the government to institute the death penalty for the LGBTQ+ community. Despite heavy criticism from the Indianapolis community for its hateful remark, the church has refused to back down, instead celebrating the exposure that the incident has brought.
Incidents like this continue to raise concerns about balancing Americans’ First Amendment right to freedom of speech and the need to protect minority communities from hate speech. According to a survey by the Cato Institute, 79% of Americans believe that hate speech is unacceptable but only 40% believe that the government should prevent it. Furthermore, 82% of Americans say hate speech is difficult to regulate because it has no standardized definition. When it comes to the LGBTQ+ community, 56% of Americans believe that calling gays and lesbians slurs is hate speech, while 39% believe that it is offensive but not hateful. Only 28% believe that calling homosexuality a sin is hate speech.
Even the courts have struggled to define hate speech. There is no legal definition of hate speech in U.S. law, but broadly speaking, hate speech is protected by the First Amendment unless it expresses serious intent to commit violence against a specific individual or incites others to imminent unlawful action. For that reason, statements such as those made by the SFBC, which are inflammatory but do not indicate intent to commit violence, are usually protected under the law.
However, that doesn’t mean that communities can’t do anything to protect targeted groups. In response to the hateful sermon, the Concerned Clergy of Indianapolis (CCI), a fellowship of pastors and other concerned citizens advocating against injustice, racism, ageism, classism and sexism from a faith-based perspective, released a statement condemning the SFBC’s words. By stating that the church is “called to be a sanctuary for the marginalized, not a platform for prejudice,” CCI demonstrated their support for the LGBTQ+ community and their commitment to fight for “dignity, inclusion, and justice for all people.”
The actions of the CCI demonstrate the vital role that faith leaders can play in standing up for LGBTQ+ communities. When faith groups refuse to turn their back on the LGBTQ+ community, they also prevent the weaponization of religion to pursue hate. Instead, they advocate for a more inclusive vision of America where religious individuals, LGBTQ+ individuals, and those who are both can fight for a future built on dignity, mutual respect, and equality.
On August 15th, Interfaith Alliance joined 125 other organizations to express concern over President Trump’s decision to assert control over the District of Columbia Metropolitan Police Department (MPD) and to deploy the National Guard throughout the city. Rather than helping to protect DC communities, this decision represents a terrifying instance of executive overreach to amass political power and to undermine our democracy.
In Tom Stoppard’s play Jumpers, he penned the line: “It’s not the voting that’s democracy, it’s the counting.” In our democratic republic, the way in which votes are counted decides who represents us, whose votes matter. President Trump is currently working with allies in state legislatures across the country to change where votes in their states are counted, in an undemocratic attempt to maintain control of the U.S. House of Representatives in the 2026 midterm elections by building on years of attacks on decades-old voter protection laws. For decades, elected officials have attempted to gerrymander districts in their respective states in order to maintain their party’s political power, but never has a president publicly strategized on how to use ad-hoc redistricting in order to maintain his political power.
Texans of all faiths are uniting in filing a lawsuit against Senate Bill No. 10 (S.B. 10), which requires Texas public school classrooms to display the Ten Commandments. The bill specifically mandates the display must be at least sixteen by twenty inches, hung in a "conspicuous space,” and follow a specific phrasing most commonly aligned with Protestant beliefs.