
The Rhode Island State Council of Churches (RISCC) is the lead plaintiff in Rhode Island State Council of Churches v. Rollins, which was brought by a nationwide coalition of local governments, charitable, legal, small businesses, and workers’ rights organizations. They are represented by Democracy Forward and Lawyers Committee for Rhode Island, and already won an initial victory in federal court to keep SNAP payments going. This solidarity statement is organized by Interfaith Alliance in consultation with RISCC.
We, the undersigned faith leaders across the United States, express our solidarity with the Rhode Island State Council of Churches (RISCC) for their just action in suing the Trump administration over its attempt to halt the Supplemental Nutrition Assistance Program (SNAP) during the government shutdown. RISCC is not alone. Faith-based organizations around the country are meeting the needs of hungry Americans who are already suffering under other cuts by the Trump administration to benefits and services. The Trump administration’s decision to halt and even “undo” SNAP payments will make more Americans hungry – and many of those hungry Americans will turn to houses of worship and faith-based food pantries as their last resort. Meeting this surge in demand will be unsustainable for religious communities and divert funds away from other ministries. The legal fight to maintain SNAP payments through the shutdown is not just about hunger, but also the ability of our houses of worship and faith-based organizations to continue to keep their doors open to provide for the American people. This is yet another example of the Administration’s lack of appreciation for the role that American churches and other faith communities play in our society.

A Texas Episcopal priest’s detention by ICE is a concerning development in the midst of the Trump administration's attack on religious freedom. It shows how unchecked enforcement threatens our faith communities and furthers an already eroding public trust.

The memorandum NSPM-7 enables the administration to investigate and prosecute individuals and entities it deems to be a threat to national security. In reality, NSPM-7 is a method to suppress free speech; it is not designed to actually address national security concerns.