The SAVE Act is not what it seems.
Analysis

The SAVE Act is not what it seems.

May 22, 2025

The SAVE Act is not what it seems.

Jeffrey Jordan, Rosa Casey-Teeley, Kennedy Perry

On April 10, the U.S. House of Representatives passed the SAVE Act (Safeguard American Voter Eligibility Act), a bill that, under the guise of protecting election integrity, would erect new and unnecessary barriers to the ballot box nationwide. This piece of legislation threatens the very foundation of American democracy and civil liberties, particularly for marginalized communities.

Studies show that up to 21 million Americans, about 11% of voting-age citizens, do not have government-issued photo ID. For many, obtaining the necessary documentation can be burdensome, costly, or inaccessible, especially in rural and under-resourced areas. Rather than protecting democracy, the SAVE Act weaponizes the false narrative of widespread voter fraud to suppress voter participation by not only implementing voter ID law, but requiring that every voter prove their citizenship each time they go to cast their ballot.

According to the Brennan Center for Justice, the incident rate of noncitizen voting in U.S. elections is 0.0001%. Yet, this legislation could disenfranchise millions, especially naturalized citizens, seniors, Indigenous voters, and communities of color, who may not have easy access to the documentation required.

At its core, the SAVE Act is not about safeguarding elections—it’s about shrinking who gets to participate in them. 

Think of who would be targeted:

  • Naturalized citizens who already completed a rigorous legal process to earn the right to vote
  • Elderly voters born in rural hospitals or at home without official records
  • Indigenous people whose sovereign status is often misunderstood or misclassified
  • Students, low-income folks, and unhoused people whose documents may be lost, outdated, or burdensome to obtain
  • Women who have a different last name on their birth certificate
  • Voters who live in a city and have no need for a driver’s license

Voter suppression laws, such as the SAVE Act, have historically been used to exclude and silence. Part of a longer arc of voter suppression tactics dressed up in legal language—poll taxes, literacy tests, English-only ballots. Now it’s “documentary proof.” The SAVE Act isn’t about securing democracy—it’s about controlling who participates in it. 

Under the disguise of "election integrity," the SAVE Act would require documentary proof of citizenship to vote in federal elections, something millions of eligible voters, predominantly low-income, Black, Indigenous, and immigrant folks, simply don’t have easy access to. This means that veterans would no longer be able to use their military ID alone to identify themselves, even drivers’ licenses wouldn’t be adequate identification under the SAVE Act. 

This piece of legislation isn’t about fraud. It’s about fear. It’s not about protecting votes. It’s about purging voters from access to advocate for their use of power. 

So what can we do?

  • Call it what it is by using clear messaging
    • A voter suppression bill that targets marginalized communities
    • A surveillance expansion tool masquerading as “election integrity”
    • A solution in search of a problem—because voter fraud is not widespread
  • Educate your community and houses of worship: Share how this bill would impact real communities through voter suppression.
  • Organize in your city, county, or state: Hold teach-ins, community forums, and digital info sessions. 
    • Form or strengthen alliances across:
      • Voting rights organizations
      • Immigrant justice and refugee networks
      • Faith-based coalitions
      • Disability justice organizations
      • HBCUs and youth-led civic groups
    • Focus on intersectionality: Emphasize how the SAVE Act would harm multiple communities simultaneously, especially those with overlapping marginalized identities.
  • Put pressure on your Senators. Demand that they publicly oppose the SAVE Act and any similar legislation.
    • Call and email your senators to urge them to oppose the SAVE Act.
    • Use coordinated call-in days and patch-through tools.
    • Send op-eds and letters to the editor.
    • Partner with the local press to elevate the stakes.

  • Stay grounded in the truth: Our communities are not a threat to democracy—we are the democracy.

We don't need more barriers.
We need more access, more voices, more justice.

The views and beliefs expressed in this post and all Interfaith Alliance blogs are those held by the author of each respective piece. To learn more about the organizational views, policies and positions of Interfaith Alliance on any issues, please contact info@interfaithalliance.org.

Transcript

The Trump Administration’s Latest Attacks on Muslim Community Leaders
Analysis
September 29, 2025

The Trump Administration’s Latest Attacks on Muslim Community Leaders

After months in detention, we finally received the good news that Ohio chaplain Ayman Soliman was released from jail as the U.S. Department of Homeland Security (DHS) dropped his deportation case. Soliman was an interfaith chaplain at a children’s hospital and a longtime leader of the Ohio Muslim community with deep ties to interfaith work across the state. As ProPublica reported, Soliman’s asylum status was restored and his application for a green card was revived. This news came through the dedicated hard work and advocacy of many organizations, particularly CAIR-Ohio and his colleagues at the Cincinnati Children’s Hospital, who were fired for speaking out on his behalf.

Mahmoud Khalil’s deportation case has alarming implications
Analysis
September 3, 2025

Mahmoud Khalil’s deportation case has alarming implications

Earlier this year, during the holy month of Ramadan, ICE agents followed Columbia graduate student Mahmoud Khalil home after he broke his fast and forcibly detained him without a warrant. Khalil, a Palestinian activist, was then disappeared into an unmarked vehicle and taken to an unknown location as his pregnant wife watched and pleaded for information. It was later revealed that Khalil had been moved to a detention center in Jena, Louisiana, where he faced deportation. He was held for over three months in poor conditions, missing his graduation and the birth of his first child. 

True Religious Freedom Means Protecting Our Faith Leaders, Not Detaining Them
Analysis
August 19, 2025

True Religious Freedom Means Protecting Our Faith Leaders, Not Detaining Them

In early July, Ayman Soliman, a former Cincinnati Children’s Hospital chaplain, was detained by Immigration and Customs Enforcement (ICE) after his asylum status was terminated in June. In response, local faith leaders organized a prayer vigil, rally, and peaceful march; during the march at least 15 protesters were detained by local police and charged with felony rioting.