The Rise of AI Generated Hate Content
Analysis

The Rise of AI Generated Hate Content

July 15, 2025

The views and beliefs expressed in this post and all Interfaith Alliance blogs are those held by the author of each respective piece. To learn more about the organizational views, policies and positions of Interfaith Alliance on any issues, please contact info@interfaithalliance.org.

Grok, X’s artificial intelligence chatbot, went on a rampage last week, responding to user questions with antisemitic statements and at one point calling itself “MechaHitler.” Despite the posts being taken down and a statement from X that it was “taking action to ban hate speech,” Grok continued to make antisemitic statements later that week. 

In a similar incident a couple months ago, Grok repeatedly made the claim that there was a white genocide occuring in South Africa, stating that it had been “instructed by my creators” to make those statements. Notably, Grok discussed this supposed genocide even in response to questions unrelated to the topic.

These incidents come amid an increase in hateful content online and a decrease in active moderation from social media companies. Advocacy groups have noted that antisemitic and Islamaphobic posts have risen dramatically, due in part to the conflict in the Middle East. Existing far-right platforms and accounts have used the conflict as a way to expand their reach beyond traditional right-wing audiences in an effort to gain more supporters for their hateful messages.

However, the incident with Grok illustrates a growing trend of using AI to create hate content, particularly antisemitic and Islamaphobic content, which is shared to a wide audience. Although companies say they have built safeguards into their AI tools, these safeguards aren’t always effective. For example, if the content an AI model is trained on is biased or prejudiced in some way, that can impact every response the AI returns to any query on any topic. Alternatively, individuals can creatively word questions to get hate content in response.

As these incidents show, the rise of AI can make hate speech even harder to moderate. Not only is it easier than ever to generate hate speech, but AI chat bots that disseminate hateful content often appear more reliable than traditional hate accounts. For that reason, minority communities, particularly minority religious communities, are increasingly under attack. In order to create a safe community for all individuals online, social media companies must be more transparent about the data used to train AI models and must be more proactive in combatting AI generated hate content on their platforms. Furthermore, governments need to take urgent action on regulating AI generated hate content to ensure that content moderation meets a baseline standard, ensuring that our digital spaces are welcoming to all.

Transcript

True Religious Freedom Means Protecting Our Faith Leaders, Not Detaining Them
Analysis
August 19, 2025

True Religious Freedom Means Protecting Our Faith Leaders, Not Detaining Them

In early July, Ayman Soliman, a former Cincinnati Children’s Hospital chaplain, was detained by Immigration and Customs Enforcement (ICE) after his asylum status was terminated in June. In response, local faith leaders organized a prayer vigil, rally, and peaceful march; during the march at least 15 protesters were detained by local police and charged with felony rioting.

New Research Finds the Supreme Court Shows Bias Towards Christian Groups
Analysis
August 12, 2025

New Research Finds the Supreme Court Shows Bias Towards Christian Groups

In a recently published article in the Cambridge Journal of Political Affairs, Adam Hamdan offers a statistical analysis of the role religion plays in Supreme Court cases. The article builds on previous studies examining the interplay between religious beliefs and Supreme Court cases to find that under the Roberts Court, the Supreme Court has sided with religious groups more than previous courts, especially when it comes to Christian groups. This finding mirrors public perception of the Supreme Court, as a recent PEW Research Center study found that 35% of Americans see SCOTUS as friendly toward religion, a significant increase from the 18% of Americans that believed that in 2019.

Speaker Mike Johnson’s Attack on Church-State Separation Violates 250 Years of American Religious Liberty
Analysis
July 22, 2025

Speaker Mike Johnson’s Attack on Church-State Separation Violates 250 Years of American Religious Liberty

On July 12, Speaker of the House Mike Johnson posted an article on X titled “The True Meaning of ‘The Separation of Church and State.’” In it, Speaker Johnson argues that the original intent of the “separation of church and state” doctrine was to allow religious groups to influence the government while protecting them from government regulation.