Trump and SCOTUS are Dismantling Church-State Separation. Learn how to fight back on 8/11 at 1:00 - 2:15 pm ET
Register
Analysis
Tracking Trump's executive orders: Gender-affirming care
Executive Order 14187: Protecting Children From Chemical and Surgical Mutilation
Date Signed: January 28, 2025
Key Provisions:
- Executive Order 14187 asserts that gender-affirming care is a “radical and false” practice that harms children, refers to different forms of care as “mutilation,” and claims these forms of care are a “stain” on American society
- Executive Order 14187 seeks to block hormone treatments, puberty blockers, and procedures aimed at changing one’s appearance from being performed on transgender people under the age of 18
- This aims to undermine the merit and credibility of the World Professional Association for Transgender Health, a non-partisan and professional organization made up of medical professionals, by labeling it as “junk science”
- Executive Order 14187 directs the Department of Justice to investigate states and pharmaceutical companies that provide gender-affirming care to minors
Interfaith Alliance Counterpoints:
- Interfaith Alliance has consistently supported the LGBTQ+ community and honors the intrinsic value of all trans and non-binary individuals, especially by acknowledging their right to access gender-affirming health care. Interfaith Alliance is deeply alarmed at the Trump Administration’s efforts to delegitimize the lived experiences of trans youth.
- We believe that medical decisions should be made by patients and their families, and the federal government is not entitled to strip away this freedom. We also oppose the harassment of medical professionals who provide gender-affirming care to families who seek it.
- The language used in this EO, including “sterilization,” “mutilation,” and regret at the inability to have and/or breastfeed children is deeply offensive. This language not only erases the vast body of research supporting the validity of trans experience, but further stigmatizes life-saving gender affirming care.
- It is our moral duty as citizens to be fully informed, and this includes respecting the expertise of trusted sources and organizations. The World Professional Association for Transgender Health has long been an institution that has held up the rights of trans people, publishing reports based on science and research, and should not be disregarded as “junk science” just because the research they publish does not align with the views of President Trump.
Transcript
True Religious Freedom Means Protecting Our Faith Leaders, Not Detaining Them
In early July, Ayman Soliman, a former Cincinnati Children’s Hospital chaplain, was detained by Immigration and Customs Enforcement (ICE) after his asylum status was terminated in June. In response, local faith leaders organized a prayer vigil, rally, and peaceful march; during the march at least 15 protesters were detained by local police and charged with felony rioting.
New Research Finds the Supreme Court Shows Bias Towards Christian Groups
In a recently published article in the Cambridge Journal of Political Affairs, Adam Hamdan offers a statistical analysis of the role religion plays in Supreme Court cases. The article builds on previous studies examining the interplay between religious beliefs and Supreme Court cases to find that under the Roberts Court, the Supreme Court has sided with religious groups more than previous courts, especially when it comes to Christian groups. This finding mirrors public perception of the Supreme Court, as a recent PEW Research Center study found that 35% of Americans see SCOTUS as friendly toward religion, a significant increase from the 18% of Americans that believed that in 2019.
Speaker Mike Johnson’s Attack on Church-State Separation Violates 250 Years of American Religious Liberty
On July 12, Speaker of the House Mike Johnson posted an article on X titled “The True Meaning of ‘The Separation of Church and State.’” In it, Speaker Johnson argues that the original intent of the “separation of church and state” doctrine was to allow religious groups to influence the government while protecting them from government regulation.