Trump and SCOTUS are Dismantling Church-State Separation. Learn how to fight back on 8/11 at 1:00 - 2:15 pm ET
RegisterSince taking office, the Trump administration has launched a relentless attack on faith leaders and our cherished religious communities. But this week, the Trump administration decided to raise the stakes in our battle for religious freedom by announcing a new plan: they are creating a Task Force to Eradicate Anti-Christian Bias.
Interfaith Alliance strongly embraces the religious freedom of all Americans, including for Christians, but this Executive Order will do the opposite of that. Instead of protecting the rights of Christians to pray and worship as they please, it uses the language of religious freedom to attack trans people, critique our right to reproductive freedom, and defend discriminatory adoption policies. The Executive Order claims to protect Christians against a predatory government that makes them embrace inclusive and welcoming values. But as we know from polling data from the Public Religion Research Institute, a majority of people of faith support nondiscrimination policies against our LGBTQ neighbors.
Here’s an example of this policy at work. In the Executive Order, it claims that “the previous Administration engaged in an egregious pattern of targeting peaceful Christians, while ignoring violent, anti-Christian offenses.” But the examples they cite is of the Biden Administration’s choice to press charges against people interfering with the rights of women at abortion facilities and the FBI’s independent decision to monitor Christian nationalists who were deemed a national security threat.
This Task Force will review all departments and agencies for anti-Christian policies or actions, recommend for the head of those agencies to end those policies, and calls for the President to rectify past injustices of anti-Christian conduct and to protect religious liberty. The task force will submit a first report after 120 days, a second one after a year, and then a final one upon the task force’s dissolution. Funding will come from the Department of Justice and the Task Force will terminate after two years, unless its responsibilities are extended by the President.
Interfaith Alliance agrees that it’s essential to protect the religious freedom of all Americans, including for Christians and especially those from marginalized sects. However, we reject the idea that breaking federal laws or using one’s religion to discriminate is legitimate grounds for the freedom of religion. Therefore, we insist that religious freedom must include everyone, not only the select few. While this effort may appear to address certain forms of stigma against Christians, particularly against Catholics, in reality it weaponizes a certain understanding of religious freedom to legitimize discrimination against marginalized groups, infringe on our reproductive freedom, and hurt our society’s most vulnerable.
We refuse to accept that our religious freedom must come on the backs of marginalized communities. We call upon all people of faith to oppose the creation of this new task force and to defend true religious freedom.
Zev Mishell is the National Programs Associate at Interfaith Alliance.
In early July, Ayman Soliman, a former Cincinnati Children’s Hospital chaplain, was detained by Immigration and Customs Enforcement (ICE) after his asylum status was terminated in June. In response, local faith leaders organized a prayer vigil, rally, and peaceful march; during the march at least 15 protesters were detained by local police and charged with felony rioting.
In a recently published article in the Cambridge Journal of Political Affairs, Adam Hamdan offers a statistical analysis of the role religion plays in Supreme Court cases. The article builds on previous studies examining the interplay between religious beliefs and Supreme Court cases to find that under the Roberts Court, the Supreme Court has sided with religious groups more than previous courts, especially when it comes to Christian groups. This finding mirrors public perception of the Supreme Court, as a recent PEW Research Center study found that 35% of Americans see SCOTUS as friendly toward religion, a significant increase from the 18% of Americans that believed that in 2019.
On July 12, Speaker of the House Mike Johnson posted an article on X titled “The True Meaning of ‘The Separation of Church and State.’” In it, Speaker Johnson argues that the original intent of the “separation of church and state” doctrine was to allow religious groups to influence the government while protecting them from government regulation.