How School Vouchers Blur the Line Between Church and State
Analysis

How School Vouchers Blur the Line Between Church and State

January 8, 2025

In recent years, a quiet but powerful movement has been gaining steam across the United States: the push for school vouchers. While these programs are often sold as empowering parents and improving educational opportunities, their real impact is far more complicated. As more states adopt or expand school voucher programs, and with the potential for federal legislation in 2025, we must take a hard look at what school vouchers mean for the future of public education, and what they mean for the most vulnerable students in our society.

School vouchers allow parents to use public funds for private schooling options, including religious schools, which are often exempt from the regulations that govern public schools. The logic behind these programs is simple: give parents the power to choose where their children go to school, apparently offering more opportunities for educational improvement. However, the reality is much murkier.

Across the country, vouchers are spreading rapidly. Voucher programs are transforming the educational landscape in states like Florida, Arizona, and Iowa. These programs are often sold as “solutions” to what are perceived as failing public schools. However, what is left unsaid is how these programs divert desperately needed resources away from public schools, which serve 90% of students in this country.

Moreover, the expansion of school vouchers opens the door to taxpayer dollars funding religious institutions, many of which include religious teachings as part of their curriculum. This blurs the line between church and state, a fundamental principle enshrined in the First Amendment. Schools that receive voucher money are not required to teach secular curricula or comply with the same anti-discrimination laws that apply to public schools. This leaves religious and conservative values to shape educational experiences, often at the expense of more inclusive, diverse approaches to learning.

We also cannot ignore the growing connection between school vouchers and the broader ideological agenda of the far-right. School choice programs are often presented as a way to improve educational outcomes, but in practice, they are often part of a strategy to impose conservative religious values on the education system. This is a direct assault on the secular nature of public education, which serves as a critical space for children from diverse backgrounds to come together, free from the influence of religious dogma.

In 2024, the Educational Choice for Children Act was introduced, which would further expand the scope of school vouchers through significant tax incentives. Under this bill, individuals would receive a tax credit for donations to scholarship-granting organizations, which fund private school tuition for low-income students. While supporters argue that this will increase educational options, the reality is that it will divert billions of taxpayer dollars to private and religious institutions. This bill specifically ensures that religious schools are free from government oversight, including protections against discrimination based on religious character or affiliation.

At this critical moment, we cannot allow the forces pushing for school vouchers to dictate the future of education in our country. As we approach 2025, we must be clear-eyed about the dangers of expanding these programs and stand firm in our commitment to a public education system that is truly inclusive and accountable. This is not just about money or policy, it’s about children's future and the kind of society we want them to inherit.

Transcript

Mahmoud Khalil’s deportation case has alarming implications
Analysis
September 3, 2025

Mahmoud Khalil’s deportation case has alarming implications

Earlier this year, during the holy month of Ramadan, ICE agents followed Columbia graduate student Mahmoud Khalil home after he broke his fast and forcibly detained him without a warrant. Khalil, a Palestinian activist, was then disappeared into an unmarked vehicle and taken to an unknown location as his pregnant wife watched and pleaded for information. It was later revealed that Khalil had been moved to a detention center in Jena, Louisiana, where he faced deportation. He was held for over three months in poor conditions, missing his graduation and the birth of his first child. 

True Religious Freedom Means Protecting Our Faith Leaders, Not Detaining Them
Analysis
August 19, 2025

True Religious Freedom Means Protecting Our Faith Leaders, Not Detaining Them

In early July, Ayman Soliman, a former Cincinnati Children’s Hospital chaplain, was detained by Immigration and Customs Enforcement (ICE) after his asylum status was terminated in June. In response, local faith leaders organized a prayer vigil, rally, and peaceful march; during the march at least 15 protesters were detained by local police and charged with felony rioting.

What Project 2025 Tells Us the Trump Administration Will do Next to Limit Access to Reproductive Healthcare
Analysis
August 12, 2025

What Project 2025 Tells Us the Trump Administration Will do Next to Limit Access to Reproductive Healthcare

Project 2025 is a federal policy blueprint published in 2023 by then-former Trump administration officials and far right policy professionals, organized by The Heritage Foundation. The 920-page document outlines a detailed policy agenda designed to establish an authoritarian government while curbing civil rights protections. In particular, it is interested in restricting access to abortions and other forms of reproductive healthcare.