Religious favoritism harms both believers and nonbelievers
Advocacy

Religious favoritism harms both believers and nonbelievers

April 10, 2026

Interfaith Alliance believes all Americans are  entitled to our religious freedom rights. People of all faiths and the nonreligious are equal under the U.S. Constitution. Vice President of Programs and Strategy Guthrie Graves-Fitzsimmons participated in webinar discussion about religious liberty sponsored by Americans United for Separation of Church and State. He was joined by Sam McGuire fromAmerican Atheists, Paul Golin from Society for Humanistic Judaism, and Tahil Sharma from theNational LGBTQ Task Force.

Together, they challenged the assumption that religious freedom primarily belongs to people of faith, while church-state separation is treated as a niche concern of the nonreligious. They also examined how religious favoritism harms both believers and nonbelievers, highlighted shared values, and offered a more inclusive vision of religious freedom grounded in civil liberties and human rights.

Transcript

Reflections from the Interfaith Democracy Breakfast Roundtable
Advocacy
August 13, 2026

Reflections from the Interfaith Democracy Breakfast Roundtable

As a tribute to the legacy of Congressman John Lewis, faith and civil rights leaders - together with sitting Senators - gathered to discuss the work our communities are doing to protect the freedom to vote.

Trump Administration's Religious Liberty Commission Draft Report Politicizes Faith Instead of Protecting It
Advocacy
July 13, 2026

Trump Administration's Religious Liberty Commission Draft Report Politicizes Faith Instead of Protecting It

Interfaith Alliance has submitted a formal comment to the Religious Liberty Commission in opposition to the recommendations in their draft report.

Trump Administration's Proposed Rule Uses Religion to Limit Access to Federal Housing
Advocacy
June 29, 2026

Trump Administration's Proposed Rule Uses Religion to Limit Access to Federal Housing

Interfaith Alliance has submitted a formal comment to the Department of Housing and Urban Development in opposition to the proposed revision to the Equal Access Rule