Tracking Trump's executive orders: The White House "Faith Office"
Analysis

Tracking Trump's executive orders: The White House "Faith Office"

February 7, 2025

Executive Order 14205: Establishment of the White House Faith Office

Date Signed: February 7, 2025

Key Provisions:

  • Executive Order 14205 renames the “White House Office of Faith-Based and Community Initiatives” to the “White House Faith Office”
  • The Office will be housed in the Domestic Policy Council and will consult various experts who will “be identified based on their expertise in a broad range of areas in which faith-based entities, community organizations, and houses of worship operate, including protecting women and children; strengthening marriage and family; lifting up individuals through work and self-sufficiency, defending religious liberty; combatting anti-Semitic, anti-Christian, and additional forms of anti-religious bias; promoting foster care and adoption programs in partnership with faith-based entities; providing wholesome and effective education; preventing and reducing crime and facilitating prisoner reentry; promoting recovery from substance use disorder; and fostering flourishing minds.”
  • It will coordinate widely between the federal government and faith-based organizations, including to provide “training and education regarding religious liberty exceptions, accommodations, or exemptions” (likely from nondiscrimination requirements) and to identify grant opportunities for faith groups that have previously been ineligible for this type of support.
  • It will collaborate with the Attorney General’s office to identify concerns from faith-based partners and supposedly work to uphold the highest standard of religious liberty
  • Agencies that lack a Center of Faith will “designate or appoint a Faith Liaison” to oversee the agency’s relationship to the White House Faith Office
  • Pastor Paula White-Cain will lead the office. She was involved in the first Trump administration and is a well-known member of the New Apostolic Reformation, a group seeking Christian dominion over American politics, and a proponent of the "prosperity gospel”

Interfaith Alliance Counterpoints:

  • Interfaith Alliance welcomes faith-based engagement from the government, but only when it respects the separation of church and state and honors the needs of diverse local communities.
  • By removing “and neighborhood partnerships” from the office’s name and mission, this office is now clearly promoting religion. It’s not the government’s role to aid or inhibit religious exercise.
  • Instead of partnering with both faith-based and other community-based organizations as previous administrations have attempted to do, the Office’s stated policy priorities suggest it will largely center on the interests of right-wing Christians and will not serve a diversity of religious groups.
  • By highlighting trainings around religious exemptions, this Office is likely concentrating its efforts on coordinating federal funding for religious organizations and offering trainings to learn more about how to weaponize an organization’s religious affiliation to evade anti-discrimination laws.

Transcript

True Religious Freedom Means Protecting Our Faith Leaders, Not Detaining Them
Analysis
August 19, 2025

True Religious Freedom Means Protecting Our Faith Leaders, Not Detaining Them

In early July, Ayman Soliman, a former Cincinnati Children’s Hospital chaplain, was detained by Immigration and Customs Enforcement (ICE) after his asylum status was terminated in June. In response, local faith leaders organized a prayer vigil, rally, and peaceful march; during the march at least 15 protesters were detained by local police and charged with felony rioting.

New Research Finds the Supreme Court Shows Bias Towards Christian Groups
Analysis
August 12, 2025

New Research Finds the Supreme Court Shows Bias Towards Christian Groups

In a recently published article in the Cambridge Journal of Political Affairs, Adam Hamdan offers a statistical analysis of the role religion plays in Supreme Court cases. The article builds on previous studies examining the interplay between religious beliefs and Supreme Court cases to find that under the Roberts Court, the Supreme Court has sided with religious groups more than previous courts, especially when it comes to Christian groups. This finding mirrors public perception of the Supreme Court, as a recent PEW Research Center study found that 35% of Americans see SCOTUS as friendly toward religion, a significant increase from the 18% of Americans that believed that in 2019.

Speaker Mike Johnson’s Attack on Church-State Separation Violates 250 Years of American Religious Liberty
Analysis
July 22, 2025

Speaker Mike Johnson’s Attack on Church-State Separation Violates 250 Years of American Religious Liberty

On July 12, Speaker of the House Mike Johnson posted an article on X titled “The True Meaning of ‘The Separation of Church and State.’” In it, Speaker Johnson argues that the original intent of the “separation of church and state” doctrine was to allow religious groups to influence the government while protecting them from government regulation.